Organic dairy herds also have an excellent diet. But one of the most shocking components of the conventional dairy industry is that the use of antibiotics remains more than twice as high in animals as humans. Chickens under an organic farm get to see the light of day for much longer as well: around 81 days instead of These hens can be seen roaming around the luscious pastures, such as the one of Wood Green Farm in the Devon countryside, foraging for insects and grubs, and are also fed a supplementary diet of GM-free organic produce, like corn.
Consequentially, studies have shown the nutritional value of organic meat to be far superior to that of industrial livestock, with higher omega-3 fatty acids, lower cholesterol, low amounts of bad saturated fats, and higher levels of conjugated linoleic acid CLA , known for its cancer-fighting properties. Free range and organic egg laying hens at Haye Farm in Devon.
On an organic farm, each hen is completely free-range and is allowed a minimum of 10 square metres of outside space , with better access to the outdoors and the ability to behave naturally.
Under the Soil Association organic standards, maximum flock sizes for hens are just 2,, whereas intensively-reared free-range hens are commonly around 30, There is a wide range of standards in between these two figures: the RSPCA assured standard is set at a maximum of 16, hens, and the EU organic standard is 3, hens. DEFRA is the overseers behind the organic regulations and guidelines but leaves the nitty-gritty application, inspection, and certification processes up to the 9 UK organic control bodies.
There are a handful of organic bodies which certify products or producers to an organic standard. Each one carries a different stamp of approval. The Soil Association want to ensure the highest possible standards of animal welfare and environmental and wildlife protection, and so set higher standards than EU organic regulation. So now we know what organic means, what are the advantages of organic food for people and the planet?
These values promote quality over quantity, encouraging farmers to produce food that is free of contamination from man-made pesticides, GMOs, growth enhancers, or artificial additives, which in turn makes organic food a healthier choice for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
According to a study published in the British Journal of Nutrition BJN , which analysed peer-reviewed publications, researchers found that organic produce contains 18 to 69 percent higher concentrations of antioxidants, meaning that in one portion, organic foodsters consume two to three times more antioxidants than what can be found in one portion of non-organic produce.
Organic farms have higher levels of soil fertility and do a much better job of storing carbon in the soil than conventional farms. In fact , if 10, medium-sized farms would convert to organic, they would store so much carbon in the soil that it would be equivalent to taking 1,, cars off the road. These are all manufactured by third-parties, rather than the farmers themselves, and the more of these artificial products are used, the less effective they become, like the pesticide resistance that many insects and organisms have developed over the years of excessive pesticide use.
The international team behind the work suggests that switching to organic fruit and vegetables could give the same benefits as adding one or two portions of the recommended "five a day". It is the first study to demonstrate clear and wide-ranging differences between organic and conventional fruits, vegetables and cereals. The researchers say the increased levels of antioxidants are equivalent to "one to two of the five portions of fruits and vegetables recommended to be consumed daily and would therefore be significant and meaningful in terms of human nutrition, if information linking these [compounds] to the health benefits associated with increased fruit, vegetable and whole grain consumption is confirmed".
The findings will bring to the boil a long-simmering row over whether those differences mean organic food is better for people, with one expert calling the work sexed up. Tom Sanders, a professor of nutrition at King's College London, said the research did show some differences. And are they nutritionally relevant? I am not convinced. He said Leifert's work had caused controversy in the past.
He is oversexing [this report] a bit. The research was peer-reviewed and is published in a respected scientific journal, the British Journal of Nutrition. Looking deeper into the soil, non-organic farming practices can strip nutrients from the soil, which consequently has adverse effects on the environment, and our health. If we think about the health of the soil and having the presence of these chemicals, it sets a foundation for growth in this sort of environment, leaving worrying traces of pesticides on what is grown.
Farmers and producers are becoming innovative with the way that they grow, creating chemical free ways to manage their crops with natural alternative forms that can keep the richness of the soil and plants without compromising health; and we mean health in its widest form, in terms of humans, soil and the environment.
Moving into the nutritional density of organic food, in the past people have questioned the validity of whether or not organic food does have more nutritional emphasis — and studies have proven it does. This really demonstrates rate clear and wide-ranging differences between organic and conventional fruits, vegetables and cereals. Factors such as production of antioxidants to fight pest attacks natural, can be contributed to their high nutritional value. This occurs due to the lack of protection from chemical sprays, meaning they inherently create more antioxidants to fight them off without the use of external applicants.
Therefore, the long-term effects of many synthetic substances are not known. Additionally, inorganic foods typically contain fewer nutrients than organic food items. Further, some evidence exists that the synthetic substances used to produce inorganic food items may cause long-term damage to the land, ultimately making the land less fertile or non-fertile. Join Free Sign In. Articles Organic vs. Inorganic Foods. Organic vs Inorganic Foods Organic foods are food items produced using processes without synthetics such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
Organic Foods In addition to not using synthetics during the production process, organic foods are not genetically modified and do not contain any chemical food additives or solvents.
Pros There are several commonly associated benefits associated with organic foods. Cons The primary argument against the consumption of organic foods relates to food safety.
Inorganic Foods Inorganic Foods use synthetics during the production process. Pros The synthetic materials used in the production of inorganic food items can help to control contamination with potentially dangerous mold toxins and bacteria.
Cons Many of the synthetic substances found in inorganic food items do not have long term studies available confirming the safety of these substances over time.
0コメント